In one paragraphArticle in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
5 authors.
Anup D PatelDivision of Neurology and Center of Clinical Excellence (ADP), Nationwide Children's Hospital, OH; Department of Pediatrics (ADP), The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus; Department of Neurology (LY, KK), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (CB), Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; and Department of Neurology (LKJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9313-1541 Laurice YangDivision of Neurology and Center of Clinical Excellence (ADP), Nationwide Children's Hospital, OH; Department of Pediatrics (ADP), The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus; Department of Neurology (LY, KK), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (CB), Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; and Department of Neurology (LKJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2794-2260 Kathryn KvamDivision of Neurology and Center of Clinical Excellence (ADP), Nationwide Children's Hospital, OH; Department of Pediatrics (ADP), The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus; Department of Neurology (LY, KK), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (CB), Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; and Department of Neurology (LKJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2532-8315 Christine BacaDivision of Neurology and Center of Clinical Excellence (ADP), Nationwide Children's Hospital, OH; Department of Pediatrics (ADP), The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus; Department of Neurology (LY, KK), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (CB), Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; and Department of Neurology (LKJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3060-6561 Lyell K JonesDivision of Neurology and Center of Clinical Excellence (ADP), Nationwide Children's Hospital, OH; Department of Pediatrics (ADP), The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus; Department of Neurology (LY, KK), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (CB), Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; and Department of Neurology (LKJ), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5851-8705 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Objective: To describe a pragmatic process for translating quality improvement (QI) projects into published manuscripts. Scope: Types of QI work that are generalizable and have broad relevance (to journals and readers), design principles that are important for publishable QI work, how QI manuscript organization might differ from biomedical manuscripts, how to use and not to use Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence and other guidelines, pitfalls, and how to avoid/repair them.
Identifiers
PMID39678224
PMCPMC11637468
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390