ArticleBioinformatics advances2024
Optimizing design of genomics studies for clonal evolution analysis.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computationally reconstructing the evolution of cancer progression risk.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Genomic biotechnology has rapidly advanced, allowing for the inference and modification of genetic and epigenetic information at the single-cell level. While these tools hold enormous potential for basic and clinical research, they also raise difficult issues of how to design studies to deploy them most effectively. In designing a genomic study, a modern researcher might combine many sequencing modalities and sampling protocols, each with different utility, costs, and other tradeoffs. This is especially relevant for studies of somatic variation, which may involve highly heterogeneous cell populations whose differences can be probed Results: The central problem this paper attempts to address is how one might create an optimal study design for a genomic analysis, with particular focus on studies involving somatic variation that occur most often with application to cancer genomics. We pose the study design problem as a stochastic constrained nonlinear optimization problem. We introduce a Bayesian optimization framework that iteratively optimizes for an objective function using surrogate modeling combined with pattern and gradient search. We demonstrate our procedure on several test cases to derive resource and study design allocations optimized for various goals and criteria, demonstrating its ability to optimize study designs efficiently across diverse scenarios. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/CMUSchwartzLab/StudyDesignOptimization.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.