Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678203›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2024

Introducing GWAStic: a user-friendly, cross-platform solution for genome-wide association studies and genomic prediction.

Stefanie Lück, Uwe Scholz, Dimitar Douchkov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefanie LückDepartment of Breeding Research, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Seeland, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0536-835X
Uwe ScholzDepartment of Breeding Research, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Seeland, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6113-3518
Dimitar DouchkovDepartment of Breeding Research, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Seeland, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6603-4930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Advances in genomics have created an insistent need for accessible tools that simplify complex genetic data analysis, enabling researchers across fields to harness the power of genome-wide association studies and genomic prediction. GWAStic was developed to bridge this gap, providing an intuitive platform that combines artificial intelligence with traditional statistical methods, making sophisticated genomic analysis accessible without requiring deep expertise in statistical software. Results: We present GWAStic, an intuitive, cross-platform desktop application designed to streamline genome-wide association studies and genomic prediction for biological and medical researchers. With a user-friendly graphical interface, GWAStic integrates machine learning and traditional statistical approaches to support genetic analysis. The application accepts inputs from standard text-based Variant Call Formats and PLINK binary files, generating clear graphical outputs, including Manhattan plots, quantile-quantile plots, and genomic prediction correlation plots to enhance data visualization and analysis. Availability and implementation: Project page: https://github.com/snowformatics/gwastic_desktop; GWAStic documentation: https://snowformatics.gitbook.io/product-docs; PyPI: https://pypi.org/project/gwastic-desktop/.

Identifiers

PMID39678203
PMCPMC11643344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.