Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678193›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024

Impact of confirmatory test results on subtype classification and biochemical outcome following unilateral adrenalectomy in patients with primary aldosteronism.

Hediyeh Daneshpour, Denise Brüdgam, Isabel Stüfchen, Daniel Alexander Heinrich, Martin Bidlingmaier, Felix Beuschlein, Lydia Kürzinger, Tracy Ann Williams, Martin Reincke, Holger Schneider and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hediyeh DaneshpourMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany.
Denise BrüdgamMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany.
Isabel StüfchenMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany.
Daniel Alexander HeinrichMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany.
Martin BidlingmaierMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany.
Felix BeuschleinMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany.
Lydia KürzingerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Tracy Ann WilliamsMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany.
Martin ReinckeMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany.
Holger SchneiderMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany.
Christian AdolfMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common form of endocrine hypertension. According to the Endocrine Society Practice Guidelines, the diagnosis of PA requires a pathological screening test result and non-suppressible aldosterone levels during confirmatory testing. Sequential testing with more than one confirmatory test may result in discordant test results. Objective and patients: We investigated the association of discordant results of captopril challenge test (CCT) and saline infusion test (SIT) on patient subtype classification by adrenal vein sampling (AVS) and outcome in 111 consecutive patients from the German Conn's Registry. Concordance was defined as non-suppressible aldosterone levels upon both tests, while discordance was defined as conflicting test results. Patients with unilateral disease were offered adrenalectomy (ADX). Biochemical and clinical outcomes were assessed using the PASO criteria. Results: 85 of 111 (77%) patients had concordant results of CCT and SIT. Although baseline characteristics were comparable between patients with concordant and discordant tests, the latter had significantly lower aldosterone levels after testing (CCT: 170 vs. 114pg/ml; SIT: 139 vs. 101pg/ml; p=0.004). In 35% of patients with discordant (n=9) and 46% of concordant test results (n=39), AVS suggested lateralized PA. In 36 of 48 cases ADX was performed. 86% of patients with discordant and 72% with concordant results had complete biochemical success. Conclusion: The use of two confirmatory tests in patients with PA results in discordant results in approximately 23% of cases. Patients having discordant confirmatory test results had a comparable rate of lateralized PA and underwent adrenalectomy with similar long-term outcome.

Indexed as

AdrenalectomyAldosteroneHyperaldosteronismAdultAgedCaptoprilFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAldosteroneCaptoprilaldosteronecaptopril challenge testconfirmatory testPASO criteriasaline infusion test

Identifiers

PMID39678193
PMCPMC11637841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.