ArticleEcology and evolution2024
Density, Climate, and Stochasticity Shape Four Centuries of Population Dynamics for Two Long-Lived Tree Species.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dynamics of colonizing populations may be strongly influenced by both extrinsic (e.g., climate and competition) and intrinsic (e.g., density) forces as well as demographic and environmental stochasticity. Understanding the impacts of these effects is crucial for predicting range expansions, trailing edge dynamics, and the viability of rare species, but the general importance of each of these forces remains unclear. Here, we assemble establishment time and spatial locations of most individuals that have reached maturity in six isolated, establishing populations of two pine species. These data allow us to quantify the relative importance of multiple factors in controlling growth of these populations. We found that climate, density, site, and demographic stochasticity were of varying importance both within and across species, but that no driver appeared to dominate dynamics across all populations and time periods. Indeed, exclusion of any one of these effects greatly reduced predictive power of our population growth models. Given the similarity in the abiotic characteristics of these sites, the varying importance of these classes of effects was surprising but speaks to the need to consider multiple effects when predicting the dynamics of small and colonizing populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.