Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678119›Full record

ReviewInnovative surgical sciences2024

A narrative review of present knowledge and digital approaches in orthognathic surgery.

Constanze Friedrich, Constantin Graw, Juliane Kröplin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innovative surgical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Constanze FriedrichDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Constantin GrawDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Juliane KröplinDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Anomalies of jaw position and shape affect approximately 10 % of the population. They can have a significant impact on quality of life, which is why the continuous improvement of therapeutic approaches is a key concern in oral and maxillofacial surgery. The aim of this narrative review article is to examine the development of orthognathic surgery in the context of traditional and innovative methods. Content: A Pubmed-based selective literature search was performed considering literature predominantly from 2022 to 2023. Search terms were "orthognathic surgery" in combination with "virtual surgical planning" and "3D printing". Summary: Depending on the extent of the existing anomalies, there are purely orthodontic or combined orthodontic-surgical treatment approaches. Technological innovations in particular are changing both the therapeutic approach and the planning of surgical treatment to an almost completely digital workflow. This change can lead to greater precision in treatment and more efficient planning, resulting in reduced costs and an overall improvement in clinical outcomes, including patient satisfaction. Outlook: This study presents an overview of the field of orthognathic surgery and discusses developments and challenges for the future. With traditional approaches being time-consuming and prone to error digital technologies like VSP, AI and PSIs improve accuracy and efficiency, though challenges persist.

Indexed as

approachesorthognathicplanningsurgeriessurgicaltreatment

Identifiers

PMID39678119
PMCPMC11638821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.