Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39678079›Full record

ReviewOpen access journal of contraception2024

Contraception Use in Cancer Survivors, Clinical Practice and Patients' Preferences.

Giorgia Asinaro, Sara Stigliani, Edoardo Chiappe, Matteo Lambertini, Claudia Massarotti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open access journal of contraception, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giorgia AsinaroIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-2691-4589
Sara StiglianiIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit, Genova, Italy.
Edoardo ChiappeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Matteo LambertiniDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1797-5296
Claudia MassarottiIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1905-2786

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current literature suggests that emergency contraception, defined as a therapy aimed at preventing an unwanted pregnancy after unprotected or insufficiently protected intercourse, is used more by cancer survivors than by the general population. This may be related to reduced use of contraception in women after cancer diagnosis and, when it is used, to a choice of less effective methods, even in the absence of contraindications to hormonal options. The purpose of this review is to analyze the use of contraception in these patients, its predictors and the preferred methods, as well as to try to define timing and characteristics of an effective contraception counseling. Factors identified as predictors of contraception usage were younger age, having a partner and better sexual function, having children, past use and having received contraception counseling by a gynecologist, especially in the previous year. Contraception counseling should start before oncological therapies, together with information regarding fertility and sexual health, preferably by the gynecologist of the oncofertility unit, with a specific expertise in dealing with cancer patients. Increased awareness of oncologists and family medicine doctors is fundamental to optimize contraception use and compliance with the prescribed method. Major guidelines regarding oncological care in women of fertile age already recommend contraception counseling, but optimal timing and mode of the consultation(s) options should be further researched, to be better detailed in all relevant documents.

Indexed as

cancer survivorscontraception after cancercontraceptive counselingemergency contraceptionfertility counselingoncofertility unit

Identifiers

PMID39678079
PMCPMC11646390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.