ArticleCancer management and research2024
Sebaceous Carcinoma in the Right Inguinal Region with Multiple Metastases and a Poor Prognosis: A Case Report.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sebaceous carcinoma (SC) is a rare malignancy and can be divided into two types, ocular and extra-ocular SC. Extra-ocular SC is typically associated with a better prognosis than ocular SC. However, extra-ocular SCs located in atypical areas, such as the inguinal region, along with multiple metastases, are uncommon and present significant challenges, often leading to poorer outcomes. Case Description: We present the case of a 68-year-old male patient who initially presented with a mass in the right inguinal region with multiple metastasis. A PET-CT scan revealed multiple enlarged lymph nodes and soft tissue masses in the abdominal and pelvic cavities. A biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of extra-ocular SC. Unfortunately, the disease progressed rapidly, and the patient succumbed to his illness just four months after diagnosis. Conclusion: This case highlights the aggressive nature of extra-ocular SC in unusual locations, underscoring the necessity for heightened awareness and further research on this rare condition. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of extra-ocular SC and emphasize the urgent need for more investigation into optimal management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.