ArticleCureus2024
Impact of Spinal Anesthesia Dosage in Elective Cesarean Section on the Duration of Stay in Post-Anesthesia Care Unit at the Women's Health Hospital, National Guard Health Affairs.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low-dose spinal anesthesia in cesarean section: a narrative review.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the field of obstetrics, cesarean sections have now become the most prominent procedure for the delivery of newborns. Cesarean sections may be handled with a variety of different anesthetic approaches, of which most focus seems to be on that of spinal forms, due to their rapid and effective action. Dosages of spinal anesthesia formulations differ depending on multiple variables, such as depth of anesthesia, level of analgesia, and desired duration of effects. Furthermore, length of stay in the hospital is also a crucial variable to take into account when using spinal anesthesia due to its implications for patient comfort, quality of care, and return to daily life. Hyperbaric bupivacaine is a mainstay agent in regard to cesarean section anesthesia, with the most commonly used dosages being 1.8 mL and 2.0 mL. This study aims to assess the difference in duration of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit between patients receiving 1.8 mL and 2.0 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Of the 306 patients who underwent elective cesarean sections, 63 patients received 2.0 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 243 patients received 1.8 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.