ArticleCureus2024
Assessing the Effect of a Pandemic on Emergency Medical Service Response Times and Interventions for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly disrupted emergency medical service (EMS) prehospital care for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), necessitating a thorough assessment of its effects on prehospital time and emergency interventions. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the changes in EMS operations before and after the onset of the pandemic and their potential effects on patient care.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed OHCA cases between January 2017 and December 2022, categorizing them into pre-pandemic and pandemic phases. We examined the prehospital time from call intake to hospital arrival, analyzing time segments in detail (on-scene arrival, patient contact, loading, and departure) and procedural frequency/location. Changes in prehospital time, requests for hospital admission, laryngeal tube insertion, and venous line establishment were assessed using a multivariate analysis.
resultsAmong the 925 OHCA cases, the pandemic phase (n = 467) experienced a 3-minute average prehospital delay compared with the pre-pandemic phase (n = 458) (P < 0.0001). Specifically, on-scene arrival time (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.06; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36-3.11), laryngeal tube insertions (aOR: 3.2; 95% CI: 2.1-4.9), and post-transport venous access placements (aOR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.06-2.63) increased. Hospital admission requests also increased significantly (aOR: 9.5; 95% CI: 2.78-32.7).
conclusionThese findings indicate that pandemic conditions delayed EMS responses and altered clinical practices, highlighting the urgent need for EMS system enhancements to improve on-site interventions. Therefore, addressing these challenges, particularly through strategies that expedite early adrenaline administration, is essential for optimizing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.