ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2024
Collider-based movement detection and control of wearable soft robots for visually augmenting dance performance.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fusion of wearable soft robotic actuators and motion-tracking sensors can enhance dance performance, amplifying its visual language and communicative potential. However, the intricate and unpredictable nature of improvisational dance poses unique challenges for existing motion-tracking methods, underscoring the need for more adaptable solutions. Conventional methods such as optical tracking face limitations due to limb occlusion. The use of inertial measurement units (IMUs) can alleviate some of these challenges; however, their movement detection algorithms are complex and often based on fixed thresholds. Additionally, machine learning algorithms are unsuitable for detecting the arbitrary motion of improvisational dancers due to the non-repetitive and unique nature of their movements, resulting in limited available training data. To address these challenges, we introduce a collider-based movement detection algorithm. Colliders are modeled as virtual mass-spring-damper systems with its response related to dynamics of limb segments. Individual colliders are defined in planes corresponding to the limbs' degrees of freedom. The system responses of these colliders relate to limb dynamics and can be used to quantify dynamic movements such as jab as demonstrated herein. One key advantage of collider dynamics is their ability to capture complex limb movements in their relative frame, as opposed to the global frame, thus avoiding drift issues common with IMUs. Additionally, we propose a simplified movement detection scheme based on individual dynamic system response variable, as opposed to fixed thresholds that consider multiple variables simultaneously (i.e., displacement, velocity, and acceleration). Our approach combines the collider-based algorithm with a hashing method to design a robust and high-speed detection algorithm for improvised dance motions. Experimental results demonstrate that our algorithm effectively detects improvisational dance movements, allowing control of wearable, origami-based soft actuators that can change size and lighting based on detected movements. This innovative method allows dancers to trigger events on stage, creating a unique organic aesthetics that seamlessly integrates technology with spontaneous movements. Our research highlights how this approach not only enriches dance performances by blending tradition and innovation but also enhances the expressive capabilities of dance, demonstrating the potential for technology to elevate and augment this art form.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.