Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39677877›Full record

ArticleReumatologia2024

Automatic assessment of nailfold capillaroscopy software: a pilot study.

Olga Elżbieta Brzezińska, Krzysztof Andrzej Rychlicki-Kicior, Joanna Samanta Makowska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reumatologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olga Elżbieta BrzezińskaDepartment of Rheumatology, Medical University of Lodz, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3885-8497
Krzysztof Andrzej Rychlicki-KiciorUniversity of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3419-745X
Joanna Samanta MakowskaDepartment of Rheumatology, Medical University of Lodz, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2036-375X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Capillaroscopy is a simple method of nailfold capillary imaging, used to diagnose diseases from the systemic sclerosis spectrum. However, the assessment of the capillary image is time-consuming and subjective. This makes it difficult to use for a detailed comparison of studies assessed by various physicians. This pilot study aimed to validate software used for automatic capillary counting and image classification as normal or pathological. Material and methods: The study was based on the assessment of 200 capillaroscopic images obtained from patients suffering from systemic sclerosis or scleroderma spectrum diseases and healthy people. Dinolite MEDL4N Pro was used to perform capillaroscopy. Each image was analysed manually and described using working software. The neural network was trained using the fast.ai library (based on PyTorch). The ResNet-34 deep residual neural network was chosen; 10-fold cross-validation with the validation and test set was performed, using the Darknet-YoloV3 state of the art neural network in a GPU-optimized (P5000 GPU) environment. For the calculation of 1 mm capillaries, an additional detection mechanism was designed. Results: The results obtained under neural network training were compared to the results obtained in manual analysis. The sensitivity of the automatic tool relative to manual assessment in classification of correct vs. pathological images was 89.0%, specificity 89.4% for the training group, in validation 89.0% and 86.9% respectively. For the average number of capillaries in 1 mm the precision of real images detected within the region of interest was 96.48%. Conclusions: The pilot software for fully automatic capillaroscopic image assessment can be a useful tool for the rapid classification of a normal and altered capillaroscopy pattern. In addition, it allows one to quickly calculate the number of capillaries. In the future, the tool will be developed and will make it possible to obtain full imaging characteristics independent of the experience of the examiner.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecapillaroscopydeep learningmicroangiopathy

Identifiers

PMID39677877
PMCPMC11635619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.