ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
A negative binomial latent factor model for paired microbiome sequencing data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Microbiome compositional data are often collected from several body sites and exhibit dependency among them. Analyzing microbial compositions from different sites jointly allows for effective borrowing of information by exploiting the underlying cross-site correlation, which can lead to more effective statistical analysis, especially when the sample size at one or both sites is limited. To this end, we introduce a joint model for microbiome compositions at two (or more) sites within the same subjects. Our model incorporates (i) latent factors shared across two body sites to explain the common subject effects and to serve as the source of correlation between the two sites; and (ii) mixtures of latent factors to allow heterogeneity among the samples in their level of cross-site association. The model is illustrated with synthetic data and we apply it in a case study involving samples of the urinary and vaginal microbiome collected from women. Results: Simulation studies show how common subject effects influence regression analysis results; a stronger association between two sites in the data causes a greater degree of bias in the analysis. The model with latent factors mitigates the bias present in the model without latent factors, whereas the two models perform comparably for the data set without paired associations. In a case study involving samples collected from a study on the female urogenital microbiome with aging (e.g., the UMICRO study), our model leads to the detection of covariate associations of the vaginal and urinary microbiome composition that are otherwise not statistically significant under a similar regression model applied to the two sites separately. Our model also enables prediction of the microbial abundance at one site based on observations from another site. We also consider a model extension that allows the clustering of subjects (samples) and cluster-specific levels of paired association. Under the extended modeling framework, the clusters can be classified according to their association strengths.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.