ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
From Micro to Macro: Avian Chromosome Evolution is Dominated by Natural Selection.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Birds display striking variation in chromosome number, defying the traditional view of highly conserved avian karyotypes. However, the evolutionary drivers of this variability remain unclear. To address this, we fit probabilistic models of chromosome number evolution across birds, enabling us to estimate rates of evolution for total chromosome number and the number of microchromosomes and macrochromosomes while simultaneously accounting for the impact of other evolving traits. Our analyses revealed higher rates of chromosome fusion than fission across all bird lineages. Notably, much of this signal was driven by Passeriformes, where migratory species showed a particularly strong bias towards fusions compared to sedentary counterparts. Furthermore, a robust correlation between the rearrangement rates of microchromosomes and macrochromosomes suggests that genome-wide processes drive rates of structural evolution. Additionally, we found that lineages with larger population sizes exhibited higher rates of both fusion and fission, indicating that positive selection plays a dominant role in driving divergence in chromosome number. Our findings illuminate the evolutionary dynamics of avian karyotypes and highlight that, while the fitness effects of random structural mutations are often deleterious, beneficial mutations may dominate karyotype divergence in some clades.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.