ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Identifying Family Structures from Obituaries and Matching them to Patients in an Electronic Heath Record.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Family data is a valuable data source in bioinformatic research. This is because family members often share common genetic and environmental exposures. Collecting this family data is traditionally very labor intensive but advances in electronic health record (EHR) data mining has proven useful when identifying pedigrees linked to longitudinal health histories. These are called e-pedigrees. Unfortunately, e-pedigrees tend to miss the oldest generations who inherently have the longest and richest health histories. A good source of family data from older generations includes obituaries, as they have a formulaic nature making them a good candidate for natural language processing that can extract relationships to the decedent. While there have been several studies on obtaining such data from obituaries, we demonstrate for the first-time approaches that tie that information to an EHR. Results: NLP extraction resulted in 8,166,534 family members being abstracted from 567,279 obituaries published in the state of Wisconsin. After matching decedent and family members to patients in the EHR, we identified 109,365 unique patients that were put in 34,158 pedigrees. The largest pedigree consisted of 21 individuals. Heritability of adult height was quantified (H Availability and Implementation: Code is available on GitHub at https://github.com/jgmayer672/ObituaryNLP .
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.