ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Uncovering the domain language of protein functionality and cell phenotypes using DANSy.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evolution has developed a set of principles that determine feasible domain combinations, analogous to grammar within natural languages. Treating domains as words and proteins as sentences, made up of domain words, we apply a linguistic approach to represent the human proteome as an n-gram network, which we call hereafter as Domain Architecture Network Syntax (DANSy). Combining DANSy with network theory, we explore the abstract rules of domain word combinations within the human proteome and identify connections that determine feasible protein functionality. We analyze the entropic information content of these domain word connections to establish a DANSy network that balances recovering most of proteome with n-gram complexity. Additionally, we explored subnetwork languages by focusing on reversible post-translational modifications (PTMs) systems that follow a reader-writer-eraser paradigm. We find that PTM systems appear to sample grammar rules near the onset of the system expansion, but then converge towards similar grammar rules, which stabilize during the post-metazoan switch. For example, reader and writer domains are typically tightly connected through shared n-grams, but eraser domains are almost always loosely or completely disconnected from readers and writers. Additionally, after grammar fixation, domains with verb-like properties, such as writers and erasers, never appear together - consistent with the idea of natural grammar that leads to clarity and limits futile enzymatic cycles. Given how some cancer fusion genes represent the possibility for the emergence of novel language, we investigate how cancer fusion genes alter the human proteome n-gram network. We find most cancer fusion genes follow existing grammar rules. Finally, we adapt our DANSy analysis for differential expression (deDANSy) analysis to determine the relationship of coordinated changes in domain language syntax to cell phenotypes. We applied deDANSy to RNA-sequencing data from SOX10-deficient melanoma cells, finding that we can use network separation and syntax enrichment to characterize the molecular basis of cell phenotypes and identify novel information distinct from gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) approaches. Collectively, these results suggest that n-gram based analysis of proteomes is a complement to direct protein interaction approaches, is more fully described than protein-protein interaction networks, and can be used to provide unique insights for signaling pathway enrichment analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.