Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39677583›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in big data2024

Establishing and evaluating trustworthy AI: overview and research challenges.

Dominik Kowald, Sebastian Scher, Viktoria Pammer-Schindler, Peter Müllner, Kerstin Waxnegger, Lea Demelius, Angela Fessl, Maximilian Toller, Inti Gabriel Mendoza Estrada, Ilija Šimić and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in big data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Dominik KowaldKnow Center Research GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Sebastian ScherKnow Center Research GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Viktoria Pammer-SchindlerKnow Center Research GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Peter MüllnerKnow Center Research GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Kerstin WaxneggerKnow Center Research GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Lea DemeliusKnow Center Research GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Angela FesslKnow Center Research GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Maximilian TollerKnow Center Research GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Inti Gabriel Mendoza EstradaKnow Center Research GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Ilija ŠimićKnow Center Research GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Vedran SabolKnow Center Research GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Andreas TrüglerKnow Center Research GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Eduardo VeasKnow Center Research GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Roman KernKnow Center Research GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Tomislav NadSGS Digital Trusts Services GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Simone KopeinikKnow Center Research GmbH, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies (re-)shape modern life, driving innovation in a wide range of sectors. However, some AI systems have yielded unexpected or undesirable outcomes or have been used in questionable manners. As a result, there has been a surge in public and academic discussions about aspects that AI systems must fulfill to be considered trustworthy. In this paper, we synthesize existing conceptualizations of trustworthy AI along six requirements: (1) human agency and oversight, (2) fairness and non-discrimination, (3) transparency and explainability, (4) robustness and accuracy, (5) privacy and security, and (6) accountability. For each one, we provide a definition, describe how it can be established and evaluated, and discuss requirement-specific research challenges. Finally, we conclude this analysis by identifying overarching research challenges across the requirements with respect to (1) interdisciplinary research, (2) conceptual clarity, (3) context-dependency, (4) dynamics in evolving systems, and (5) investigations in real-world contexts. Thus, this paper synthesizes and consolidates a wide-ranging and active discussion currently taking place in various academic sub-communities and public forums. It aims to serve as a reference for a broad audience and as a basis for future research directions.

Indexed as

accountabilityartificial intelligencefairnesshuman agencyprivacyrobustnesstransparencytrustworthy AI

Identifiers

PMID39677583
PMCPMC11638207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.