ArticleInternational journal of women's health2024
"To Be Vaccinated or Not to Be Vaccinated": Factors Influencing COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Future Vaccination Willingness Amongst US Women of Reproductive Age.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background & Objectives: Growing data on the impact of herd immunity and susceptibility of unvaccinated persons to chronic COVID sequelae requires deeper understanding of vaccine stigma and hesitancy to facilitate population needs. Reproductive-aged women (18-45 years) were at a "vaccine paradox" during COVID-19 - hesitant to receive the vaccine, yet at increased risk for COVID infection. In this study, we sought to: identify demographic predictors, reasons, geographic location of vaccine hesitancy, and COVID-specific attributes that predict future vaccination willingness. We hypothesized that high COVID risk perception and high COVID stress would be predictors of willingness. Methods: Study Design: Cross-sectional survey of women across the United States. Main Outcomes and Measures: Vaccine hesitancy was defined as responding "No/Not Sure" to the question "Have you received any of the COVID-19 vaccines?" The COVID-Risk scale evaluate perceived COVID Risk, and the COVID-19 Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10-c) evaluated COVID stress. Open ended questions inquired about participants' vaccine concerns. Results: Of the 1,037 women who accessed the survey, 948 (91%) consented and completed. Predictors of vaccine hesitancy included younger aged parents (p=0.005), non-white race (p=0.003), and having high school or lower educational attainment (p<0.0001). Using smoking as a proxy measure of "health behavior", we found long-term smokers or quitters were more hesitant than those who never smoked (p=0.03). Geographic analyses showed the most vaccine hesitant women resided in Southeast and Midwest US. Hesitancy reasons included side effects (21%) and fertility/pregnancy concerns (4%). High COVID risk perception (p=0.0004) and high COVID stress (p=0.01) significantly predicted future willingness to get vaccinated. Conclusions and Relevance: This research provides insights for managing the "vaccine paradox" in reproductive age women, and identifying factors that influence COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and future vaccination willingness. Public health and policy advocates could target messaging around COVID risk and stress in Southeastern and Midwestern regions; as well as address women's concerns around fertility and other side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.