Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39677375›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2025

Debiasing large language models: research opportunities.

Vithya Yogarajan, Gillian Dobbie, Te Taka Keegan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vithya YogarajanSchool of Computer Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6054-9543
Gillian DobbieSchool of Computer Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7245-0367
Te Taka KeeganSchool of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8628-4993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful decision-making tools widely adopted in healthcare, finance, and transportation. Embracing the opportunities and innovations of LLMs is inevitable. However, LLMs inherit stereotypes, misrepresentations, discrimination, and societies' biases from various sources-including training data, algorithm design, and user interactions-resulting in concerns about equality, diversity, and fairness. The bias problem has triggered increased research towards defining, detecting and quantifying bias and developing debiasing techniques. The predominant focus in tackling the bias problem is skewed towards resource-rich regions such as the US and Europe, resulting in a scarcity of research in other societies. As a small country with a unique history, culture and social composition, there is an opportunity for Aotearoa New Zealand's (NZ) research community to address this inadequacy. This paper presents an experimental evaluation of existing bias metrics and debiasing techniques in the NZ context. Research gaps derived from the study and a literature review are outlined, current and ongoing research in this space are discussed, and the suggested scope of research opportunities for NZ are presented.

Indexed as

biasgenerative AILarge language modelsNew Zealandresponsible AI

Identifiers

PMID39677375
PMCPMC11639098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.