Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39677366›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2024

Predicting attentional focus: Heartbeat-evoked responses and brain dynamics during interoceptive and exteroceptive processing.

Emilia Fló, Laouen Belloli, Álvaro Cabana, Alessia Ruyant-Belabbas, Lise Jodaitis, Melanie Valente, Benjamin Rohaut, Lionel Naccache, Mario Rosanova, Angela Comanducci and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Emilia FlóInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute-ICM, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, APHP,Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1986-2802
Laouen BelloliInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute-ICM, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, APHP,Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France.
Álvaro CabanaFacultad de Psicología, UdelaR, Instituto de Fundamentos y Métodos, 11200 Montevideo, Uruguay.
Alessia Ruyant-BelabbasInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute-ICM, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, APHP,Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8576-2818
Lise JodaitisDépartement de Neurophysiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Charles Foix, Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France.
Melanie ValenteDépartement de Neurophysiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Charles Foix, Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France.
Benjamin RohautInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute-ICM, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, APHP,Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France.
Lionel NaccacheInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute-ICM, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, APHP,Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2874-1009
Mario RosanovaDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Angela ComanducciIRCSS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, 20162 Milan, Italy.
Thomas AndrillonInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute-ICM, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, APHP,Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2794-8494
Jacobo SittInstitut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute-ICM, Inserm, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, APHP,Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention shapes our consciousness content and perception by increasing the probability of becoming aware and/or better encoding a selection of the incoming inner or outer sensory world. Engaging interoceptive and exteroceptive attention should elicit distinctive neural responses to visceral and external stimuli and could be useful in detecting covert command-following in unresponsive patients. We designed a task to engage healthy participants' attention toward their heartbeats or auditory stimuli and investigated whether brain dynamics and the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) distinguished covert interoceptive-exteroceptive attention. Exteroceptive attention yielded an overall flattening of the power spectral density (PSD), whereas during interoception, there was a decrease in complexity, an increase in frontal connectivity and theta oscillations, and a modulation of the HEP. Subject-level classifiers based on HEP features classified the attentional state of 17/20 participants. Kolmogorov complexity, permutation entropy, and weighted symbolic mutual information showed comparable accuracy in classifying covert attention and exhibited a synergic behavior with the HEP features. PSD features demonstrated exceptional performance (20/20). Command-following was assessed in five brain-injured patients with a modified version of the task. An unresponsive wakefulness syndrome/vegetative state patient and a locked-in syndrome patient demonstrated a willful modulation of the HEP and together with the explored brain markers suggest that patients were complying with task instructions. Our findings underscore the importance of attentional mechanisms in shaping interoceptive and exteroceptive sensory processing and expand the framework of heart-brain interactions employed for diagnostic purposes in patients with disorders of consciousness.

Indexed as

attentiondisorders of consciousnessexteroceptionHEPinteroception

Identifiers

PMID39677366
PMCPMC11645458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.