ArticlePNAS nexus2024
Predicting attentional focus: Heartbeat-evoked responses and brain dynamics during interoceptive and exteroceptive processing.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selective interoception impairments and treatment effects in borderline personality disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Alpha Reactivity Dynamics Reveal Multi-System Variability Without Global Alpha Slowing in Fragile X Syndrome.Research square · 2026Article
- Heartbeat-evoked potentials reveal interoceptive dysfunction in clinical disorders: Experimental frameworks and promising applications.Psychological medicine · 2026Review
- Oscillatory Markers of Interoceptive Attention: Beta Suppression as a Neural Signature of Heartbeat Processing.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- An example of identifying conditional dependence in graphical models using Bayesian model averaging: general and disease specific anxiety in a cardiovascular patient sample.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- When your heart isn't in it anymore: cardiac correlates of task disengagement.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attention shapes our consciousness content and perception by increasing the probability of becoming aware and/or better encoding a selection of the incoming inner or outer sensory world. Engaging interoceptive and exteroceptive attention should elicit distinctive neural responses to visceral and external stimuli and could be useful in detecting covert command-following in unresponsive patients. We designed a task to engage healthy participants' attention toward their heartbeats or auditory stimuli and investigated whether brain dynamics and the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) distinguished covert interoceptive-exteroceptive attention. Exteroceptive attention yielded an overall flattening of the power spectral density (PSD), whereas during interoception, there was a decrease in complexity, an increase in frontal connectivity and theta oscillations, and a modulation of the HEP. Subject-level classifiers based on HEP features classified the attentional state of 17/20 participants. Kolmogorov complexity, permutation entropy, and weighted symbolic mutual information showed comparable accuracy in classifying covert attention and exhibited a synergic behavior with the HEP features. PSD features demonstrated exceptional performance (20/20). Command-following was assessed in five brain-injured patients with a modified version of the task. An unresponsive wakefulness syndrome/vegetative state patient and a locked-in syndrome patient demonstrated a willful modulation of the HEP and together with the explored brain markers suggest that patients were complying with task instructions. Our findings underscore the importance of attentional mechanisms in shaping interoceptive and exteroceptive sensory processing and expand the framework of heart-brain interactions employed for diagnostic purposes in patients with disorders of consciousness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.