ArticlePNAS nexus2024
In vivo functional significance of direct physical interaction between Period and Cryptochrome in mammalian circadian rhythm generation.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of circadian rhythms in heart failure: insights from myocardial energy metabolism.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Targeted disruption of the aralkylaminePNAS nexus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the current model, the auto-negative feedback action of Period (Per) and Cryptochrome (Cry) on their own transcription is the hallmark mechanism driving cell-autonomous circadian rhythms. Although this model likely makes sense even if Per and Cry undertake this action in a mutually independent manner, many studies have suggested the functional significance of direct physical interaction between Per and Cry. However, even though the interaction is a biochemical process that pertains to the fundamentals of the circadian oscillator, its in vivo contribution to circadian rhythm generation remains undefined. To answer this question, we focused on zinc coordination between Per and Cry, whose contribution to circadian rhythm generation remains undefined. Specifically, we aimed to impair endogenous Per-Cry association by introducing an amino acid substitution to zinc-coordinating residues located at the Per1 and Per2 C-terminal facing Cry in mice. These mice did not show severe impairment in the Per-Cry physical interaction, but rather a shortened period and decreased robustness in circadian rhythms at the tissue-autonomous and whole-body levels. Furthermore, these mice also showed a decrease in Per half-life, suggesting that impaired fine-tuning of Per half-life caused abnormal circadian period and robustness in vivo. We also found a minor but significant impact of a reindeer-specific Per2 mutation located in the Per-Cry interface on circadian rhythms in vivo. These lines of evidence indicate that only partial impairment of the Per-Cry physical interaction produces a substantial effect on circadian period and robustness, supporting the in vivo functional significance of the interaction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.