ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Performance of clinical decision aids (CDA) for the care of young febrile infants: a multicentre prospective cohort study conducted in the UK and Ireland.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05259683 (Validating Clinical Decision Aids for the Assessment and Management of Febrile Infants Presenting to Emergency Care in the UK and Ireland.), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Validating Clinical Decision Aids for the Assessment and Management of Febrile Infants Presenting to Emergency Care in the UK and Ireland.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Absent pleocytosis in infant viral central nervous system infections reflects lymphocyte depletion and cytokine activation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Variation in management of febrile infants younger than 90 days across London: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Application of Step-by-Step and Paediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Clinical Decision Aids in the management of young febrile infants in a UK cohort.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2026Observational
- Prevalence of invasive bacterial infection among febrile infants with positive urinalysis results: a planned secondary analysis of the Febrile Infants Diagnostic assessment and Outcome (FIDO) prospective observational cohort study.Archives of disease in childhood · 2025Observational
- Diagnostic test accuracy of dipstick urinalysis in clean catch urine for urinary tract infection in febrile infants presenting to emergency departments: a post-hoc analysis of the FIDO study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Scoping review of clinical decision aids in the assessment and management of febrile infants under 90 days of age.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Invasive Bacterial Infection Among Febrile Infants Aged 61 to 90 Days.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- The Prevalence of Invasive Bacterial Infection in Febrile Infants Presenting to Hospital Following Meningococcal B Immunisation: A Case Series.Pediatric reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Between 1% and 4% of febrile infants, aged from birth to 90 days of age, presenting to hospital will be diagnosed with an invasive bacterial infection (IBI). Traditional teaching has advocated a treat all approach but more recently a number of clinical decision aids (CDA) have been developed to classify febrile infants into lower and higher risk cohorts, with lower risk infants suitable for management without immediate parenteral antibiotics and lumbar puncture. The aim of this study was to apply these CDA to a UK and Irish cohort. Methods: This was a prospective multicentre cohort study of febrile infants presenting to 35 Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland (PERUKI) sites between the 6th July 2022 and the 31st August 2023. All infants received standard care as per local policy. IBI was defined as growth of bacterial pathogen in blood or cerebrospinal fluid. The performance of the following CDAs were assessed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines NG143 (Fever under 5 years), British Society Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC), Aronson rule and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) CDA. A cost comparison of each CDA against a treat all approach was conducted. Trial registration: NCT05259683. Findings: 1821 were included in the final analysis. The median age was 46 days (IQR: 30-64 days), with 1108 (61%) being male. Of the 1821 infants, 67 (3.7%) had IBI. The AAP and BSAC CDAs were the most sensitive at 0.99 (95% CI 0.92-1.0) for both with specificities of 0.23 (95% CI 0.21-0.25) and 0.20 (95% CI 0.18-0.22) respectively. The NICE NG143 and Aronson CDA were the most specific CDAs with values of 0.27 (95% CI 0.25-0.30) and 0.30 (95% CI 0.28-0.32) respectively, but their sensitivity was lower. The AAP CDA performed equally well with either procalcitonin (PCT) or C-reactive protein (CRP) as the biomarker of choice. Of the 1821 infants, 77% were admitted, 14% were discharged and 9% were ambulated. All CDAs were cost saving for hospital services when compared to a treat all approach, with the lowest mean cost per patient estimated for Aronson (£1171; bootstrap 95% CI £1129-£1214) and NICE NG143 CDA (£1218; bootstrap 95% CI £1174-£1263). Interpretation: The AAP and BSAC CDAs are highly sensitive at excluding IBI, with a cost saving to hospital services when compared to a treat all approach. The substitution of CRP for PCT made no difference to the performance of the AAP CDA in this cohort and was more costly. Funding: The Febrile Infant Diagnostic Assessment and Outcome (FIDO) study is funded by Royal College of Emergency Medicine Doctoral Fellowship (RCEM 02/03/2021). Procalcitonin analysis was supported by the Public Health Agency Northen Ireland Grant (HSC R&D-COM/5745/22). The funders played no part in the conception or design of this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.