Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39677360›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Performance of clinical decision aids (CDA) for the care of young febrile infants: a multicentre prospective cohort study conducted in the UK and Ireland.

Etimbuk Umana, Clare Mills, Hannah Norman-Bruce, Hannah Mitchell, Lisa McFetridge, Fiona Lynn, Gareth McKeeman, Steven Foster, Michael J Barrett, Damian Roland and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05259683 (Validating Clinical Decision Aids for the Assessment and Management of Febrile Infants Presenting to Emergency Care in the UK and Ireland.), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05259683 completednot on this map

Validating Clinical Decision Aids for the Assessment and Management of Febrile Infants Presenting to Emergency Care in the UK and Ireland.

TypeobservationalSponsorQueen's University, BelfastRan2022 to 2023Enrolled2,076ConditionsUrinary Tract Infections, Meningitis, Sepsis, Bacterial Infections
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Etimbuk UmanaWellcome Wolfson Institute of Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Clare MillsWellcome Wolfson Institute of Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Hannah Norman-BruceWellcome Wolfson Institute of Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Hannah MitchellMathematical Sciences Research Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Lisa McFetridgeMathematical Sciences Research Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Fiona LynnSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Gareth McKeemanDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Steven FosterEmergency Department, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, UK.
Michael J BarrettPaediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.
Damian RolandSapphire Group, Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Mark D LyttleEmergency Department, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK.
Chris WatsonWellcome Wolfson Institute of Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Thomas WaterfieldWellcome Wolfson Institute of Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland (PERUKI)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Between 1% and 4% of febrile infants, aged from birth to 90 days of age, presenting to hospital will be diagnosed with an invasive bacterial infection (IBI). Traditional teaching has advocated a treat all approach but more recently a number of clinical decision aids (CDA) have been developed to classify febrile infants into lower and higher risk cohorts, with lower risk infants suitable for management without immediate parenteral antibiotics and lumbar puncture. The aim of this study was to apply these CDA to a UK and Irish cohort. Methods: This was a prospective multicentre cohort study of febrile infants presenting to 35 Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland (PERUKI) sites between the 6th July 2022 and the 31st August 2023. All infants received standard care as per local policy. IBI was defined as growth of bacterial pathogen in blood or cerebrospinal fluid. The performance of the following CDAs were assessed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines NG143 (Fever under 5 years), British Society Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC), Aronson rule and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) CDA. A cost comparison of each CDA against a treat all approach was conducted. Trial registration: NCT05259683. Findings: 1821 were included in the final analysis. The median age was 46 days (IQR: 30-64 days), with 1108 (61%) being male. Of the 1821 infants, 67 (3.7%) had IBI. The AAP and BSAC CDAs were the most sensitive at 0.99 (95% CI 0.92-1.0) for both with specificities of 0.23 (95% CI 0.21-0.25) and 0.20 (95% CI 0.18-0.22) respectively. The NICE NG143 and Aronson CDA were the most specific CDAs with values of 0.27 (95% CI 0.25-0.30) and 0.30 (95% CI 0.28-0.32) respectively, but their sensitivity was lower. The AAP CDA performed equally well with either procalcitonin (PCT) or C-reactive protein (CRP) as the biomarker of choice. Of the 1821 infants, 77% were admitted, 14% were discharged and 9% were ambulated. All CDAs were cost saving for hospital services when compared to a treat all approach, with the lowest mean cost per patient estimated for Aronson (£1171; bootstrap 95% CI £1129-£1214) and NICE NG143 CDA (£1218; bootstrap 95% CI £1174-£1263). Interpretation: The AAP and BSAC CDAs are highly sensitive at excluding IBI, with a cost saving to hospital services when compared to a treat all approach. The substitution of CRP for PCT made no difference to the performance of the AAP CDA in this cohort and was more costly. Funding: The Febrile Infant Diagnostic Assessment and Outcome (FIDO) study is funded by Royal College of Emergency Medicine Doctoral Fellowship (RCEM 02/03/2021). Procalcitonin analysis was supported by the Public Health Agency Northen Ireland Grant (HSC R&D-COM/5745/22). The funders played no part in the conception or design of this study.

Indexed as

Clinical decision aidFebrile infantInvasive bacterial infection

Identifiers

PMID39677360
PMCPMC11638619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.