ArticleJournal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS2024
Case Report: Robotic Repair of a Perineal Hernia Following Abdominoperineal Resection.
Article in Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Two Cases of Secondary Anterior Perineal Hernia Repaired with a Pedicled Gracilis Muscle Flap.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Perineal hernias, protrusions through the pelvic diaphragm, are a rare complication post-abdominoperineal resection. The shift to extralevator APR techniques could be linked to a potential increase in these hernias. This case series evaluates the surgical management of perineal hernias, focusing on the evolving role of robotic surgery. Given the limited existing research on robotic repairs in this context, it highlights its potential as an innovative approach. Presentation of Case: In a case series, we report three patients who underwent robotic abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal and anal canal carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. The 65-year-old female developed a perineal hernia 7 months post-operatively, the 67-year-old male after 4 years, and the 63-year-old female presented with a recurrent perineal hernia post-APR with gracilis flap reconstruction. All patients underwent successful robotic hernia repairs with mesh placement and demonstrated symptomatic improvement post-operatively. Discussion: Perineal hernia management lacks a standardized protocol, with methods ranging from open to laparoscopic techniques. A review of recent literature suggests increasing favorability towards laparoscopic and robotic approaches due to their less invasive nature. Our cases demonstrate the advantages of robotic surgery's precision and improved visualization, supporting its use in perineal hernia repair, although more research is needed to confirm. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted surgery for perineal hernia repair post-APR shows promise, enhancing the benefits of laparoscopic methods. This series underlines the potential of this approach, though further investigation in larger studies is essential to establish its advantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.