Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39677355›Full record

ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2024

Evaluation of the Effect of a New Surgical Medical Drain Anti-Dislodgement Fixation Patch and Fixation Method in Postoperative Thyroid Care: A Randomized Trial.

Caizhen Zhang, Weiping Mi, Yajun Zhu, Yonghao Li, Yifan Cao, Zhensu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caizhen ZhangDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 0370001, People's Republic of China.
Weiping MiDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 0370001, People's Republic of China.
Yajun ZhuDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 0370001, People's Republic of China.
Yonghao LiDepartment of General Surgery, Department of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1171-3869
Yifan CaoThe Fifth Clinical School of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 0370001, People's Republic of China.
Zhensu LiDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 0370001, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participants: This study enrolled 294 patients admitted to the Thyroid Surgery Department of the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University between April and July 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to either the control group (145 patients) or the experimental group (149 patients). Interventions: The control group received traditional adhesive tape fixation for drains, while the experimental group utilized a newly developed fixation patch combined with a unique "C" and "S" fixation method. Both groups employed vertical negative pressure drainage. Specific Objectives or Hypotheses: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction with a novel surgical drain fixation patch and method in the context of thyroid surgery. The hypothesis was that the novel fixation patch and method would reduce drain-related adverse events, improve patient comfort, and increase patient satisfaction. Outcomes: The experimental group exhibited significantly lower rates of drain-related adverse events, including displacement, infection, and leakage, compared to the control group (3.40% vs 53.10%, P < 0.05). Additionally, patients in the experimental group reported lower neck/throat pain scores (mean score: 0.84 vs 1.40 in the control group, P < 0.05) and experienced no drain pulling pain (0% vs 1.16% in the control group, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the need for patch replacements was virtually eliminated in the experimental group (0% vs 70.86% in the control group, P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction with the fixation method was significantly higher in the experimental group (83.3% vs 46.9% in the control group, P < 0.05). Randomization: Patients were randomly assigned to the control and experimental groups, ensuring the fairness and reliability of the study. Trial Registration: The study was retrospectively registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400087677) on August 1, 2024.

Indexed as

anti-dislodgement fixation patchcervical drainsnursing adverse eventspatient’s satisfactionthyroid surgery

Identifiers

PMID39677355
PMCPMC11640031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.