ArticleJournal of inflammation research2024
The Correlation Between Uric Acid, Urinary Protein and Umbilical Artery Blood Flow Related Parameters and Maternal and Infant Prognosis in Patients with Gestational Hypertension.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nomogram for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy complicated by fetal growth restriction.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Serum creatinine, uric acid, and D-dimer levels as predictors of disease severity in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the correlation between uric acid (UA), urinary protein (UP) and umbilical artery blood flow related parameters and maternal and infant prognosis in patients with hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy (HDP). Methods: A total of 110 hDP patients who underwent prenatal examination and delivered in our hospital from June 2018 to May 2023 were selected as the HDP group. According to the prognosis of mother and infant, they were divided into normal prognosis group (n=80) and poor prognosis group (n=30). In addition, 110 healthy pregnant women who received prenatal examination in the same hospital during the same period were randomly selected as healthy control group. The maternal and infant outcomes, UA, 24-h-UP level, umbilical artery blood flow pulsation index (PI), resistance index (RI) and systolic and diastolic blood flow velocity ratio (S/D) were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the factors related to the above probability and maternal and infant prognosis. Results: The total incidence of adverse maternal and infants outcome in the HDP group was higher than that of HC (37.5% VS16.65%) (P <0.05). The HDP group UA, 24-h-UP and PI, RI, and S / D higher than HC (P <0.05). Logistic regression analysis shows that the age of pregnant women and 24-h-UP, PI, RI, S / D are related factors that affect the prognosis of adverse maternal and infants outcome (P <0.05). Conclusion: The UA and UP levels and umbilical artery blood flow-related parameters in HDP patients were significantly increased. Maternal age and 24-h-UP, RI, and S/D are all relevant factors that affect the adverse maternal and fetal prognosis of HDP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.