ArticleCureus2024
Beyond Traditional Restorations: Management With Endocrown in a Late Adolescent.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fracture resistance of CAD-CAM ceramic versus PFM endocrowns in cariously extracted mandibular Teeth: AnBioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endodontically treated molar rehabilitation is still challenging. Molars lose their mechanical properties after endodontic therapy. As a result of the pulp and surrounding dentin tissues being removed, they actually became brittle. A single one-piece restoration called an endodontic crown might be a viable alternative for crown restoration on molars with huge coronal damage presenting difficulties for endodontic treated teeth. This case report explains the successful restoration of an extensively damaged molar in a young individual using an endocrown. The decision to use this technique was guided by the patient's age, the desire to maintain natural tooth structure, and the restrictions of traditional post-and-core restorations. The endocrown, fabricated from lithium disilicate glass, offered advantages such as minimal tooth preparation, a simplified restoration process, and extraordinary esthetic and functional outcomes. Long-term research is still required, but this particular case strengthens the argument for endocrowns as a beneficial restorative alternative, especially when more conventional methods could jeopardize the tooth's long-term health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.