ReviewCureus2024
A Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis of the Eating Attitudes Test 26 (EAT-26) Scale.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and associated factors of eating disorders' risk among Alexandria University medical students.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Exploring the Relationship Between theNutrients · 2026Article
- Psychological Distress and Disordered Eating in Adults Attending an Obesity Outpatient Clinic.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- Prevalence and risk factors of disordered eating risk among Yemeni medical students: A national multicenter cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Eating Attitudes Test 26 (EAT-26) scale is a well-established tool for assessing the risk of eating disorders. A reliability generalization meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the average reliability of the EAT-26 scale scores and how reliability estimates vary according to the composition and variability of samples, to identify study characteristics that can explain its variability, and to estimate the reliability induction rate. A literature search produced 14 articles involving 15 studies that met the inclusion criteria. For the total scores of the EAT-26 scale, pooled Cronbach's alpha was 0.85, with 95% confidence intervals of 0.81 and 0.88, a standard error (SE) of 0.02, and a standard score of (Z = 43.99). Moderator analysis showed that the language, age, or sex of the participants did not affect the overall results. By assessing the reliability of research findings, researchers can examine the consistency of results across studies, which can help identify sources of variability in the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.