ArticleCureus2024
Association Between Verbal Communication With Families and Delirium in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU) significantly impacts patient outcomes. While family involvement may help prevent delirium in ICU patients, its effect during mechanical ventilation remains unclear. This study investigated the association between verbal communication during family visits and early post-extubation delirium in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Materials and methods This retrospective, analytical observational study used data from the hospital's standard electronic health record (EHR) system, which includes routine medical and nursing documentation. We conducted this study in a 10-bed emergency ICU at an academic hospital in rural Japan from April 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. We included patients aged ≥18 years who received invasive positive pressure ventilation for >48 hours. We excluded patients who were discharged while intubated, required a tracheostomy, or were unable to be assessed using the intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC). The primary outcome was the maximum ICDSC score within 24 hours post-extubation. We conducted multiple regression analyses with ICDSC as the outcome. Results A total of 110 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 64.7 years (standard deviation ± 14.3), and 73 patients were male (66.4%). The median duration of intubation was five days (interquartile range (IQR), 4-8), and the median sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was 8 (IQR, 6-11). The median ICDSC within 24 hours post-extubation was 3 (IQR, 2-5). Of the total 110 patients, 28 (25.5%) could communicate verbally. Patients who could communicate verbally had lower SOFA scores, longer duration of intubation, more frequent family visits, and higher intensive care mobility scale (IMS) scores during intubation. Neither single nor multiple regression showed a significant association between verbal communication and post-extubation ICDSC. Conclusions We did not find a statistically significant association between verbal communication during family visits with patients and ICDSC within 24 hours post-extubation. Potential confounders and variations in care practices may have influenced the results. Further studies are needed to address these limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.