ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating ChatGPT's Diagnostic Accuracy in Detecting Fundus Images.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Two AI Chatbots for Diagnosis and Providing Treatment Suggestions in Retinopathy of Prematurity: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of General-Purpose vs. Domain-Specific Multimodal Models for Diabetic Retinopathy Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Can Multimodal Large Language Models Diagnose Diabetic Retinopathy from Fundus Photos? A Quantitative Evaluation.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes in Conjunction with Roflumilast Ameliorate Chronic Kidney Disease Through the Modulation of Fibrosis and Inflammation.Advanced biology · 2025Article
- Exploring AI's Potential in Papilledema Diagnosis to Support Dermatological Treatment Decisions in Rural Healthcare.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessing the Clinical Utility of Multimodal Large Language Models in the Diagnosis and Management of Pigmented Choroidal Lesions.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Artificial intelligence is rapidly advancing in healthcare. Ophthalmology, with its reliance on imaging for diagnosis and management, has the potential to benefit from this technology. Deep learning models are currently used in image analysis in ophthalmology. ChatGPT (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA), a large language model, has recently expanded to include image analysis, creating new opportunities for diagnostic applications. While prior research shows potential in text-based diagnostics for ophthalmology, there is limited literature on AI's diagnostic accuracy in interpreting retinal images. Methods We selected 12 fundus images from key diseases identified by the Royal College of Ophthalmology curricula for medical students, foundation doctors, and trainees. Each image was presented to ChatGPT 4.0 using a standardised prompt to identify the most likely diagnosis. Responses were recorded, and the model's accuracy was assessed by comparing its diagnoses to the confirmed conditions. Results ChatGPT accurately diagnosed four out of 12 diseases (papilloedema, dry age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), glaucoma and vitreous haemorrhage) and provided one partially correct diagnosis (diabetic retinopathy). However, the model struggled with seven cases, including central retinal artery occlusion, central retinal vein occlusion, dry ARMD, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, tractional retinal detachment, epiretinal membrane and macular hole. Conclusion ChatGPT demonstrates the potential for diagnosis of retinal conditions from fundus photography. However, it currently lacks the accuracy required for clinical application; the model often hallucinates when unsure, which has diagnostic implications. Further work is required to refine these models and expand their diagnostic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.