ArticleCureus2024
Navigating Pompe Disease Assessment: A Comprehensive Scoping Review.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pompe Disease: Pathogenesis, Molecular Mechanisms, Neurological Aspects, Diagnostics and Modern Therapeutic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Elevated Transaminases: Does It Always Warrant a Liver Biopsy? Lessons Learned From Pompe Disease.JIMD reports · 2025Article
- Latest Advancements in Treatment Options for Infantile-Onset Pompe Disease: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Clinical medicine insights. Pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pompe disease (PD) is a rare progressive autosomal recessive disorder resulting from the deficiency of acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA) enzyme activity. Due to its multisystemic involvement, PD leads to significant morbidity and impacts patients' quality of life. Despite the availability of approved disease-modifying treatments, the prompt diagnosis and management of PD, which are crucial for patient outcomes, still present several challenges. This scoping review aimed to synthesize the evidence regarding methods for screening, diagnosing, and following up PD. We searched articles in English and Spanish published from 2017 to February 8, 2022, across 11 databases (i.e., Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Epistemonikos, Ingenta Connect, Medline/PubMed, SAGE, SciELO Citation Index, ScienceDirect, Springer Link, Virtual Health Library, and Wiley Online Library). We included primary studies (i.e., case reports, case series, cross-sectional studies, case controls, cohorts, clinical trials, and qualitative studies), reviews, and guidelines that described at least one assessment method for patients with confirmed clinical, genetic, or biochemical PD. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data from articles, with a third reviewer solving conflicts. We synthesized data with narrative summaries and descriptive statistics. After screening 2,139 titles and abstracts, we included 96 eligible articles. Cross-sectional studies (n = 30) and guidelines (n = 1) were the most and least prevalent designs, respectively. Most studies targeted late-onset PD (LOPD, n = 48) and infantile-onset PD (IOPD, n = 21). Eleven articles described newborn screening programs, highlighting their potential to improve PD prevalence estimations and still limited availability among countries. Overall, 81 articles documented clinical manifestations of PD. Hypotonia (n = 7) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 7) were the most documented for IOPD, while progressive muscle weakness (n = 21) and dyspnea (n = 11) were the most prevalent for LOPD. We found 26 articles reporting biochemical assays, with dried blood spots (DBS) for GAA enzyme deficiency detection being the most cited (n = 19). We also noted a lack of standardization in documenting DBS results. Additionally, 21 articles mentioned genetic studies, with next-generation sequencing emerging as the gold standard for identifying mutated alleles. Functional studies were the most utilized to follow up with patients. However, monitoring strategies for pediatric and adult PD lacked consensus, and only one article assessed patients' quality of life. This review comprehensively evaluated the literature on PD screening, diagnosis, and follow-up methods, identifying prevalent techniques within each assessment category. We emphasized the need for a more standardized approach to reporting biochemical assays, genetic testing, and clinical presentations. Our review also underscored the critical lack of standardization in PD follow-up. Addressing these gaps will enhance the comparability of future research findings and improve the quality of PD-related healthcare. Limitations of this review included restricting eligible languages and publication years to the latest five, the methodological heterogeneity of selected articles, and the lack of individual study bias assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.