Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39677168›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Brinzolamide 1%/Timolol 0.5% vs. Dorzolamide 2%/Timolol 0.5% in Indian Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Randomized Phase 3 Study.

Purvi Bhagat, Mukesh Singhania, Sujata Navare, Mohua Mazumdar, Chandrima Paul, Satish Shet, Kalyani Vks, Anjali Nicholsan, Nitesh Bansal, Prachi Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Purvi BhagatOphthalmology, Civil Hospital Campus, Ahmedabad, IND.
Mukesh SinghaniaOphthalmology, Anand Multispeciality Hospital, Ahmedabad, IND.
Sujata NavareOphthalmology, Aster Aadhar Hospital, Kolhapur, IND.
Mohua MazumdarOphthalmology, Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital, Kolkata, IND.
Chandrima PaulOphthalmology, B B Eye Foundation, Kolkata, IND.
Satish ShetOphthalmology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, IND.
Kalyani VksOphthalmology, Poona Blind Men's Association's H.V. Desai Eye Hospital, Pune, IND.
Anjali NicholsanOphthalmology, Topiwala National Medical College, Mumbai, IND.
Nitesh BansalOphthalmology, Marudhar Hospital, Jaipur, IND.
Prachi JainMedical Affairs, Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited, Mumbai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) have the potential in glaucoma management to improve efficacy due to the complementary mechanism of action of the drugs as well as compliance while reducing adverse effects by minimizing exposure to preservatives and the financial burden on the patients. FDC of brinzolamide/timolol has demonstrated efficacy and safety in multinational phase 3 studies in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension. However, efficacy and safety in the Indian population are not known. This study compared the efficacy and safety of FDC brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% with FDC dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% in Indian patients with POAG or ocular hypertension. Material and methods This 12-week randomized, phase 3, open-label, comparative, multicentric study was conducted on 221 subjects at nine sites in India, with assessments done at baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Patients with intraocular pressure (IOP) of 24-36 mmHg of the affected eye(s), either newly diagnosed or inadequately controlled on mono-therapy of carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, beta-blocker, or any other IOP-lowering therapy, were included. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either FDC of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% (n = 111) or FDC of dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% (n = 110). Primary efficacy was a noninferiority comparison of mean change in two-hour IOP and zero-hour IOP at the end of treatment compared to the respective baseline IOP. Safety was analyzed by comparing the frequency of the observed adverse events (AEs) between the two groups. Results FDC brinzolamide/timolol produced comparable and non-inferior IOP-lowering efficacy to FDC dorzolamide/timolol. The IOP reductions ranged from 6.55 to 8.36 mmHg in FDC brinzolamide/timolol group and from 5.37 to 7.55 mmHg in FDC dorzolamide/timolol group. Fewer subjects in FDC brinzolamide/timolol group experienced ocular AEs as compared with FDC dorzolamide/timolol group (9.9% vs. 26.4%), especially ocular hyperemia (2.7% vs. 22.7%). Conclusion FDC of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% affords an ocular comfort advantage with a clinically meaningful reduction in IOP that was non-inferior to FDC of dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% in Indian patients with POAG and ocular hypertension.

Indexed as

brinzolamide-timolol fdcdorzolamide-timolol fdcintraocular pressure (iop)ocular hypertensionprimary open-angle glaucoma (poag)

Identifiers

PMID39677168
PMCPMC11645172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.