ArticleCureus2024
Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Brinzolamide 1%/Timolol 0.5% vs. Dorzolamide 2%/Timolol 0.5% in Indian Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Randomized Phase 3 Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative safety and efficacy of brinzolamide/timolol and dorzolamide/timolol in the treatment of glaucoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) have the potential in glaucoma management to improve efficacy due to the complementary mechanism of action of the drugs as well as compliance while reducing adverse effects by minimizing exposure to preservatives and the financial burden on the patients. FDC of brinzolamide/timolol has demonstrated efficacy and safety in multinational phase 3 studies in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension. However, efficacy and safety in the Indian population are not known. This study compared the efficacy and safety of FDC brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% with FDC dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% in Indian patients with POAG or ocular hypertension. Material and methods This 12-week randomized, phase 3, open-label, comparative, multicentric study was conducted on 221 subjects at nine sites in India, with assessments done at baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Patients with intraocular pressure (IOP) of 24-36 mmHg of the affected eye(s), either newly diagnosed or inadequately controlled on mono-therapy of carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, beta-blocker, or any other IOP-lowering therapy, were included. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either FDC of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% (n = 111) or FDC of dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% (n = 110). Primary efficacy was a noninferiority comparison of mean change in two-hour IOP and zero-hour IOP at the end of treatment compared to the respective baseline IOP. Safety was analyzed by comparing the frequency of the observed adverse events (AEs) between the two groups. Results FDC brinzolamide/timolol produced comparable and non-inferior IOP-lowering efficacy to FDC dorzolamide/timolol. The IOP reductions ranged from 6.55 to 8.36 mmHg in FDC brinzolamide/timolol group and from 5.37 to 7.55 mmHg in FDC dorzolamide/timolol group. Fewer subjects in FDC brinzolamide/timolol group experienced ocular AEs as compared with FDC dorzolamide/timolol group (9.9% vs. 26.4%), especially ocular hyperemia (2.7% vs. 22.7%). Conclusion FDC of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% affords an ocular comfort advantage with a clinically meaningful reduction in IOP that was non-inferior to FDC of dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% in Indian patients with POAG and ocular hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.