ReviewCureus2024
Effectiveness of General Medicine in the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Rural Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of rural residence on clinical outcomes in SLE: a systematic review.Lupus science & medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Interventions for Persistent Pain Despite Low Inflammatory Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Article
- Progressive Muscle Weakness and Dysphagia in Late-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Article
- The interaction between a leflunomide-response methylation site (cg17330251) and variant (rs705379) on response to leflunomide in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a global autoimmune disease causing significant morbidity, particularly in rural areas with limited rheumatology care access. Primary care plays a crucial role in early RA detection and management. This systematic review evaluates RA management in rural primary care to identify ways to enhance quality of care. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a meta-ethnography synthesis was conducted on studies from PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase (April 1995-December 2023). Quality was assessed using the best evidence in medical education (BEME) scale, focusing on diagnosis, treatment barriers, and collaboration between general physicians (GPs) and specialists. Of 55 studies, 11 were included. Significant diagnostic delays were linked to patient, physician, and systemic factors. Barriers included limited GP rheumatology training, inefficient referrals, and poor patient-specialist communication. Successful strategies involved GP education, telehealth (e-consults), and collaborative care models. Thematic analysis highlighted patient behaviors, GP knowledge gaps, and the need for interdisciplinary collaboration. Rural RA management faces challenges such as diagnostic delays and limited resources. Key improvements include enhancing GP education, utilizing telehealth, and streamlining referral systems. A multifaceted approach emphasizing the role of primary care in early diagnosis and management is essential to improving RA care in underserved areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.