ReviewCureus2024
Continuation of CDK4/6 Inhibition and Switching of Hormonal Therapy After Progression on Prior CDK4/6 Inhibitors in HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Efficacy, Safety, and Prognostic Factors of Dalpiciclib Combined with Endocrine Therapy After Progression on CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Patients with HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Article
- CDK4/6 as a Therapeutic Target in HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer Cells-Current Treatment Status.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to determine the efficacy of maintaining cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibition and switching endocrine therapy (ET) versus ET alone after progression on prior CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in patients with hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative breast cancer. We identified phase II and III comparative randomized clinical trials through a systematic search across relevant clinical databases. A random effects model was used to determine the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) according to the inverse-variance method. Heterogeneity was measured using tau
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.