ArticleCureus2024
Awareness, Training, and Perceived Needs of Gynecologists in Interpreting Basic Imaging Studies: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGynecologists often rely on imaging studies such as ultrasound, CT, and MRI for clinical decision-making, yet limited training in interpreting these studies may affect their confidence and ability to make timely diagnoses. This study aimed to assess the awareness, training and perceived needs of gynecologists in Saudi Arabia regarding the interpretation of basic imaging studies.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 200 gynecologists practicing in Saudi Arabia. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling, and data were collected through an online questionnaire that assessed demographics, imaging knowledge, training history, perceived barriers, and interest in further education. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.
resultsThe majority of respondents (44%) reported interpreting imaging studies occasionally, with ultrasound being the most commonly interpreted modality (63%). However, only 29% had received formal training in imaging studies, and 74% felt their training was insufficient. Most respondents (82%) expressed interest in additional training, particularly in ultrasound interpretation and emergency imaging. Key barriers to effective imaging interpretation included lack of training (43%) and reliance on radiology reports (24%). Nearly half (45%) of participants noted that delays in radiology reports affected their clinical decision-making.
conclusionsThis study reveals significant gaps in imaging interpretation training among gynecologists in Saudi Arabia, with a high demand for further education in basic imaging modalities. Addressing these gaps through structured training programs could improve gynecologists' confidence and clinical decision-making, ultimately leading to better patient care outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.