ArticleCureus2024
Antibiotic Stewardship in Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation and Comparison of Antibiotic Prescribing Practices and Treatment Outcomes in Children with Pneumonia Admitted to Public and Private Hospitals in Pakistan: A Retrospective Study.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Antimicrobial resistance and incorrect use of antibiotics may worsen hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), which is a serious illness associated with healthcare and is related to higher rates of morbidity and death. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) in optimizing the treatment of HAP, focusing on improving patient outcomes and reducing resistance. Methodology A prospective cohort study was conducted from August 2022 to July 2023. Data were gathered on the demographics, comorbidities, antibiotic treatment plans, and clinical outcomes of adult patients with HAP diagnoses. The efficacy of ASPs was evaluated by statistical studies, which included logistic regression. Results A total of 428 participants were assessed, with notable differences between the no stewardship group (n = 220, 51.40%) and the stewardship group (n = 208, 48.60%). The stewardship group demonstrated a higher treatment success rate (n = 182, 87.5%) compared to the no stewardship group (n = 126, 57.3%). The 30-day readmission rate was lower in the stewardship group (n = 32, 15.4%) versus the no stewardship group (n = 58, 26.4%), and adverse drug reactions were reduced in the stewardship group (n = 15, 7.2%) compared to the no stewardship group (n = 45, 20.5%). In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the stewardship group (n = 16, 7.7%) than in the no stewardship group (n = 40, 18.2%). Conclusion The results show that ASP implementation greatly improves clinical outcomes for HAP patients, highlighting the need for ongoing funding in ASPs to address antibiotic resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.