ArticleWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2024
Bleeding risk from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: Analysis of the TriNetX database.
Article in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bleeding risk from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: Analysis of the TriNetX database.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Postoperative pain medications and aspirin before undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) are managed carefully due to concern for bleeding. Little is known regarding the increase in the risk of bleeding for patients unable to stop aspirin as trials are limited in this area. We compared outcomes for patients undergoing FESS who were managed postoperatively with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) versus opioids. We also determined the epistaxis rate for patients on aspirin at the time of surgery compared to those who were not on aspirin. Data Source: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing FESS using the TriNetX database. Methods: Patients were propensity-matched, and the odds of bleeding complications between the patients prescribed postoperative NSAIDs were compared to those prescribed opioids. We also compared postoperative odds of bleeding in patients unable to halt aspirin use at the time of surgery to those who were not on aspirin before surgery. Results: A total of 51,361 patients received opioids after FESS compared to 1923 patients who received NSAIDs. After propensity matching, 1918 patients were in each group and odds of epistaxis were similar between the NSAID group and the opioid group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90-1.94); 7.67% of the NSAID group required rescue opioids. Patients on aspirin who were unable to hold aspirin at surgery showed bleeding rates of 14.67% compared to 9.00% in propensity-matched controls who were not on aspirin (OR: 1.74, 95%CI: 1.20-2.51). Conclusions: NSAID use appears to be a safe alternative to opioids for patients without pre-existing risk factors for bleeding. Patients who remained on aspirin in the week before FESS had an increased risk of postoperative epistaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.