Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39677046›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2024

Feasibility and diagnostic performance of sentinel node biopsy for staging cN0 oral squamous cell carcinoma in a previously treated neck.

Therese Mørch, Jesper F Tvedskov, Irene Wessel, Birgitte W Charabi, Kathrine K Jakobsen, Christian Grønhøj, Katalin Kiss, Giedrius Lelkaitis, Jann Mortensen, Andreas Kjaer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Therese MørchDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.ORCID 0009-0002-0078-0628
Jesper F TvedskovDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Irene WesselDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Birgitte W CharabiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Kathrine K JakobsenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Christian GrønhøjDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Katalin KissDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Giedrius LelkaitisDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Jann MortensenDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine & Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet & Department of Biomedical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Andreas KjaerDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine & Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet & Department of Biomedical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Christian von BuchwaldDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Anders ChristensenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Staging of the cN0 neck with sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is validated in patients with a previously untreated neck. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of SNB and unexpected drainage patterns in patients with cT1-T2N0 OSCC and a history of previous head and neck cancer comprising treatment of the neck, that is, surgery, radiotherapy, or both. Methods: Fifty patients with a previously treated neck diagnosed with a new primary or recurrent cN0 OSCC between 2014 and 2021 were included and retrospectively analyzed. Feasibility was assessed by the rate of successfully performed SNB neck staging procedures. Based on follow-up data, the diagnostic performance of SNB was evaluated by calculation of negative predictive value (NPV) and false omission rate (FOR). Results: A SNB staging procedure was successfully performed in 76% (38/50) of the patients. Technical failures were due to the lack of drainage preoperatively or failure in intraoperative SN detection. In patients successfully staged with SNB, the rate of a positive SN was 13% (5/38). In the SNB-negative group, no patients were diagnosed with a regional node recurrence during follow-up, and the NPV and FOR were 100% and 0%, respectively. Unexpected lymphatic drainage occurred in 32% (12/38) of the patients. Conclusion: SNB is technically feasible in cT1-2N0 OSCC patients with a previously treated neck with a high diagnostic accuracy. Importantly, SNB enables the detection of individual and unexpected lymphatic drainage patterns.

Indexed as

neck metastasisneck stagingoral squamous cell carcinomaradiotherapysentinel node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID39677046
PMCPMC11634735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.