Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39677010›Full record

ArticleGMS hygiene and infection control2024

Conception and development of a neurological registry of patients with persistent health impairments following work-related COVID-19 disease in Germany.

Peter Schwenkreis, Agnessa Kozak, Andreas Gonschorek, Ingo Schmehl, Susann Seddigh, Andrea Fürst, Kai Wohlfahrt, Corinna Rademacher, Lynn Engel, Jacob Wefers and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS hygiene and infection control, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Peter SchwenkreisBG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Department of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.
Agnessa KozakGerman Social Accident Insurance Institution for the Health and Welfare Services (BGW), Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas GonschorekBG hospital Hamburg, Department of Neurology, Hamburg, Germany.
Ingo SchmehlBG hospital Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Department of Neurology, Berlin, Germany.
Susann SeddighBG hospital Duisburg, Department of Neurology, Duisburg, Germany.
Andrea FürstBG hospital Murnau, Department of Neurology, Murnau, Germany.
Kai WohlfahrtBG hospital Bergmannstrost Halle, Department of Neurology, Halle, Germany.
Corinna RademacherBG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Department of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.
Lynn EngelBG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Department of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.
Jacob WefersBG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Department of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.
Kerrin KobesCenter for Epidemiology and Health Services Research for Healthcare Professionals (CVcare), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Olaf KleinmüllerCenter for Epidemiology and Health Services Research for Healthcare Professionals (CVcare), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Jana WischnatCenter for Epidemiology and Health Services Research for Healthcare Professionals (CVcare), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Albert NienhausGerman Social Accident Insurance Institution for the Health and Welfare Services (BGW), Hamburg, Germany.
Martin TegenthoffBG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Department of Neurology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Healthcare and social workers had an increased occupational risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 during the pandemic. Some developed long-lasting symptoms known as post-COVID syndrome (PCS). To assess the consequences of COVID-19 for individuals insured by the German Social Accident Insurance, the BG hospitals (Berufsgenossenschaftliche Kliniken: clinics for occupational accident insurance) established an interdisciplinary diagnostic programme. Data collected during routine clinical practice are transmitted to a multicenter post-COVID registry to enhance knowledge of the long-term consequences related to COVID-19 and to optimize diagnostics, treatment, and rehabilitation. The design of the post-COVID registry, along with a description of the study population, is detailed in this paper. Methods: The registry includes patients with an occupational disease or accident. Depending on the severity and complexity of the symptoms, patients received an outpatient post-COVID examination or an inpatient post-COVID check (PCC). The collected data comprise demographics, occupational and social history, disease progression, pre-existing conditions, utilization of health services, persistent symptoms, and psychosocial and neuropsychological assessments. Further investigations are carried out in response to symptoms and needs, using clinical assessment, instrumental and imaging techniques, as well as questionnaires. In addition, serum and cerebrospinal fluid samples are preserved for biomarker analysis. Results: By September 2024, 1,957 patients from six BG hospitals were included. An interim analysis of 1,150 cases shows that patients are predominantly female (77%) and the average age is 51 years (standard deviation [SD] 10.5). Around 43% worked in nursing at the time of infection. In 63% of cases, an inpatient post-COVID check was carried out. About 20% were hospitalized during acute COVID-19 infection, with an average stay of 14.6 days (SD 18.4). More than half were still unable to work at the time of examination, with no significant differences between hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. Common pre-existing conditions included heart disease (48%), allergies (45%), and lung disease (33%). PCS symptoms mainly consisted of reduced physical capacity (95%), concentration difficulties (79%), and shortness of breath (69%). 81% had previously received outpatient and/or inpatient rehabilitation. Conclusion: The outpatient and the inpatient PCC are essential in managing the recovery process for patients with PCS. Data analysis will provide insights into the need for medical care and rehabilitation. In addition, longitudinal analyses will be used to track the progress of the post-COVID registry over time and monitor the effectiveness of the recommended measures.

Indexed as

acute post-COVID-19 syndromehealth personnelmulticenter post-COVID registryoccupational diseases

Identifiers

PMID39677010
PMCPMC11638854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.