ArticleExpert systems with applications2025
Identification of Gene Regulatory Networks Associated with Breast Cancer Patient Survival Using an Interpretable Deep Neural Network Model.
Article in Expert systems with applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insulin Resistance Indices Predict Mortality in Cardiovascular Disease: A Large-Scale NHANES Study With Machine Learning Validation.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial neural networks have recently gained significant attention in biomedical research. However, their utility in survival analysis still faces many challenges. In addition to designing models for high accuracy, it is essential to optimize models that provide biologically meaningful insights. With these considerations in mind, we developed a deep neural network model, MaskedNet, to identify genes and pathways whose expression at the time of diagnosis is associated with overall survival. MaskedNet was trained using TCGA breast cancer transcriptome and clinical data, and the model's final output was the predicted logarithm of the hazard ratio for death. The trained model was interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), a technique grounded in robust mathematical principles that assigns importance scores to input features. Compared to traditional Cox proportional hazards regression, MaskedNet had higher accuracy, as measured by Harrell's C-index. We also found that aggregating outputs from several model runs identified multiple genes and pathways associated with overall survival, including
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.