ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024
Machine Learning Approach to Classify
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT of Soft Tissue Infections: Current and Future Perspectives from Diagnosis to Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic strategies in necrotizing soft tissue infections: from clinical scores to multi-omics and machine learning.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- Optimization and advances in negative pressure wound therapy for the management of necrotizing fasciitis in the upper limb.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have led to increased adoption of machine learning in disease identification, particularly for challenging diagnoses like necrotizing fasciitis and Methods: This investigation incorporated 180 inpatients suffering from soft tissue infections. The participants were categorized into groups: cellulitis, non-Vibrio necrotizing fasciitis (NF), or Results: The multi-classification model possesses substantial predictive capacity, with a weighted-average AUC of 0.86, sensitivity of 87.2%, specificity of 74.5%, NPV of 81.6%, and PPV of 85.4%. The model's calibration was assessed using the Brier score, yielding a weighted mean of 0.084. This low value demonstrates a strong correlation between predicted probabilities and actual outcomes, indicating high predictive accuracy and reliability in the model's forecasts. Conclusions: We effectively developed a multiclassification model aimed at forecasting the occurrence of cellulitis, non-Vibrio NF, or V. Vulnificus NF in patients suffering from soft tissue infection, and we further described the model's predictions using the SHAP algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.