ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2024
Including Health System Capacities into the Assessment Framework of a Temperature-Resilience Health System.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study includes health system capacities into the assessment framework of a temperature-resilience health system while accounting for system interactions. Methods: In accordance with the guidelines provided by the World Health Organization, the conceptual framework of a climate-resilient health system has been adopted. The International Health Regulations are utilized to assess the health system capacities in 171 countries from year 2011 to 2019. Exploratory factor analysis and reliability tests have been conducted to confirm the validity and reliability of the framework. Moreover, a data-driven decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory method is employed to quantify the interactions among the structured aspects. Results: The assessment framework consists of five aspects, namely high temperature-sensitive risks, low temperature-sensitive risks, low-temperature exposure, vulnerability factors and health system capacities. Globally, the mean (standard deviation) for addressing the first four aspects are 0.77 (0.14), 0.87 (0.13), 0.88 (0.21), 0.72 (0.17), respectively, and health system capacities reach 0.67 (0.17). This study identifies health system capacities as the main driving forces. Interactions between it and other aspects call for multisectoral and coordinated actions. On a global scope, low-temperature exposure and its health risks, with the strongest dependence, should be prioritized to enhance temperature resilience, especially in high-income countries. In order to mitigate these risks, it might be necessary to disrupt the cascade effects resulting from low-temperature exposure by leveraging the capacities of coordination and multisectoral communication. Notably, low-income countries are more affected by high-temperature exposure, thus requiring flexible ways to strengthen temperature resilience. Discussion: Our study underscores the significance of health system capacities in strengthening a temperature-resilient health system. Undoubtedly, the development of the temperature-resilient health system ought to follow a coordinated and flexible approach, giving priority to dealing with low-temperature exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.