Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39676816›Full record

ArticleImplementation research and practice

Formative evaluation of the implementation of digital therapeutics for opioids and other substance use disorders in primary care (DIGITS trial).

Lorella Palazzo, Caitlin N Dorsey, Jess Mogk, Tara Beatty, Deborah King, Kelsey Stefanik-Guizlo, Dustin Key, Tessa E Matson, Mary Shea, Ryan M Caldeiro and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation research and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lorella PalazzoKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4736-5990
Caitlin N DorseyKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jess MogkKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Tara BeattyKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Deborah KingKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kelsey Stefanik-GuizloKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Dustin KeyKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Tessa E MatsonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mary SheaKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ryan M CaldeiroKaiser Permanente Washington Mental Health & Wellness Services, Seattle, WA, USA.
Angela Garza McWethyKaiser Permanente National Mental Health & Wellness, Seattle, WA, USA.
Edwin S WongDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abisola E IduKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joseph E GlassKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2923-3698

Funding

Digital treatments for opioids and other substance use disorders (DIGITS) in primary care: Observational Analysis of Adaptions to the InterventionR01DA047954 · NIDA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GLASS, JOSEPH EDWIN · 2019 to 2023
$3.9M
Decreasing the Engagement Gap for Addiction Treatment in Primary CareK01AA023859 · NIAAA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GLASS, JOSEPH EDWIN · 2017 to 2021
$931k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA023859NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Substance use disorders (SUDs) result in individual and societal burden. However, most individuals with SUD receive no treatment. Implementing SUD interventions in primary care could address this population's treatment needs. In the USA, reSET Method: The Dynamic Sustainability Framework and the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies guided the evaluation. Using rapid qualitative methods, we collected and analyzed observational fieldnotes, key informant interviews, and document sources (e.g., meeting minutes) for synthesis and dissemination to clinical partners and the study team via formative reports. We analyzed the reports to generate evaluation results. Results: Twenty-four primary care clinics participated. Evaluation data included 98 observational fieldnotes, 16 interviews, and 253 document sources. We produced nine formative reports. The study encountered barriers and facilitators in each DSF domain (ecological system, practice setting, and intervention). In the ecological system, the PDT vendor enabled the study, but the COVID-19 pandemic, laws, regulations, and contracting delayed implementation. In the practice setting, staff shortages and low clinic capacity were implementation challenges, while electronic health record capabilities were both barriers and facilitators. At the intervention level, non-routine workflows, clinician burden, and low patient engagement were barriers despite clinicians' efforts. Conclusions: Digital therapeutics are promising SUD and OUD treatments, but integration into primary care requires conducive laws and regulations, organizational capacity, and patient and clinician engagement. Formative evaluation identified important lessons for future PDT implementation.

Indexed as

formative evaluationimplementation sciencemHealthprimary carequalitative researchsubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID39676816
PMCPMC11639013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.