Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39676763›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin open2024

Utilizing Technology to Enhance the Ecological Validity of Cognitive and Functional Assessments in Schizophrenia: An Overview of the State-of-the-Art.

William P Horan, Raeanne C Moore, Heather G Belanger, Philip D Harvey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Validation and normative data for the BAC app in Spanish-speaking individuals with psychosis and healthy controls.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Response to Commentaries.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Naturalistic computational psychiatry: How to get there?Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William P HoranKaruna Therapeutics, A Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Boston, MA, USA.
Raeanne C MooreUniversity of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Heather G BelangerCognitive Research Corporation, St Petersburg, FL, USA.
Philip D HarveyUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive impairment is a core feature of schizophrenia and a key determinant of functional outcome. Although conventional paper-and-pencil based cognitive assessments used in schizophrenia remained relatively static during most of the 20th century, this century has witnessed the emergence of innovative digital technologies that aim to enhance the ecological validity of performance-based assessments. This narrative review provides an overview of new technologies that show promise for enhancing the ecological validity of cognitive and functional assessments. We focus on 2 approaches that are particularly relevant for schizophrenia research: (1) digital functional capacity tasks, which use simulations to measure performance of important daily life activities (e.g., virtual shopping tasks), delivered both in-person and remotely, and (2) remote device-based assessments, which include self-administered cognitive tasks (e.g., processing speed test) or functionally-focused surveys regarding momentary activities and experiences (e.g., location, social context), as well as passive sensor-based metrics (e.g., actigraphy measures of activity), during daily life. For each approach, we describe the potential for enhancing ecological validity, provide examples of select measures that have been used in schizophrenia research, summarize available data on their feasibility and validity, and consider remaining challenges. Rapidly growing evidence indicates that digital technologies have the potential to enhance the ecological validity of cognitive and functional outcome assessments, and thereby advance research into the causes of, and treatments for, functional disability in schizophrenia.

Indexed as

cognitiveecologicalenhancefunctionaltechnologyvalidity

Identifiers

PMID39676763
PMCPMC11645460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.