Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39676581›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025

Generalized expectancy of threat in threatening compared to safe contexts.

Asimina Aslanidou, Marta Andreatta, Alex H K Wong, Matthias J Wieser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Asimina AslanidouDepartment of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam 3000 DR, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0009-2605-9864
Marta AndreattaDepartment of General Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, D-72076, Germany.
Alex H K WongDepartment of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam 3000 DR, The Netherlands.
Matthias J WieserDepartment of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam 3000 DR, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fear of threatening contexts often generalizes to similar safe contexts, but few studies have investigated how contextual information influences cue generalization. In this study, we explored whether fear responses to cues would generalize more broadly in a threatening compared to a safe context. Forty-seven participants underwent a differential cue-in-context conditioning protocol followed by a generalization test, while we recorded psychophysiological and subjective responses. Two faces appeared on a computer screen in two contexts. One face (CS+) in the threat context (CTX+) was followed by a female scream 80% of the time, while another face (CS-) was not reinforced. No faces were reinforced in the safe context (CTX-). In the generalization test, the CSs and four morphs varying in similarity with the CS+ were presented in both contexts. During acquisition, conditioned responses to the cues were registered for all measures and the differential responding between CS+ and CS- was higher in CTX+ for US-expectancy ratings and skin conductance responses, but the affective ratings and steady-state visual evoked potentials were not context-sensitive. During test, adaptive generalized responses were evident for all measures. Despite increased US-expectancy ratings in CTX+, participants exhibited similar cue generalization in both contexts, suggesting that threatening contexts do not influence cue generalization.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalCuesFearGalvanic Skin ResponseGeneralization, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adultcontextcue-in-contextfear generalizationskin conductancesteady-state visual evoked potentials

Identifiers

PMID39676581
PMCPMC11711681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.