Trial reportThe Journal of dermatology2025
A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial of tapinarof cream in Japanese pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis.
Trial report in The Journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Assessing the Adverse Events of Roflumilast and Tapinarof Use in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of tapinarof in atopic dermatitis: a frequentist and bayesian meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of treatments for atopic dermatitis: a model based meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Novel nonsteroidal topical therapies for pediatric atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial of tapinarof cream in Japanese pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis.The Journal of dermatology · 2025Trial
- Pushing the Boundaries of Topical Therapy in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Review of Baseline Disease Severity and Burden in Clinical Trials.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Review
- Aryl hydrocarbon receptor pharmacology-mechanisms, ligands, and therapeutic potential.Pharmacological reviews · 2026Review
- Comparative 28-day mouse study of topically applied aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands: microbiota-derived indoles, therapeutic tapinarof, pollutants 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and diesel exhaust particles.Chemico-biological interactions · 2026Article
- Tapinarof Versus Crisaborole for Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2026Review
- The aryl hydrocarbon receptor: structure, signaling, physiology and pathology.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Review
- Tapinarof Nanogels as a Promising Therapeutic Approach.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Tapinarof Cream 1%: Pediatric First Approval.Paediatric drugs · 2025Review
- The role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor signalling in COVID-19 pathology and its therapeutic potential.Frontiers in molecular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tapinarof is a nonsteroidal, topical, aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in Japanese patients aged ≥12 years. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tapinarof in Japanese pediatric patients aged 2 to 11 years with AD in a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial. Eligible patients (N = 121) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive tapinarof cream 0.5%, tapinarof cream 1%, or vehicle cream once daily for 8 weeks. At week 8, the least-squares mean percent change from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score (the primary endpoint) was -81.29% in the tapinarof 0.5% group, -77.62% in the tapinarof 1% group, and - 18.56% in the vehicle group. Reductions in EASI score at week 8 were significantly greater in the tapinarof groups than in the vehicle group (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). The proportion of patients with ≥75% improvement from baseline in EASI score at week 8 was 77.5% in the tapinarof 0.5% group, 70.7% in the tapinarof 1% group, and 15.0% in the vehicle group. The proportion of patients who achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with ≥2-grade improvement from baseline at week 8 was 32.5% in the tapinarof 0.5% group, 43.9% in the tapinarof 1% group, and 17.5% in the vehicle group. No treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) were reported; all of the AEs were mild or moderate. Common AEs in tapinarof-treated patients included gastroenteritis, application site irritation, and nasopharyngitis. The incidence of trial discontinuations due to AEs was low in tapinarof-treated patients (one patient for each strength). In summary, both strengths of tapinarof cream demonstrated greater efficacy than vehicle cream and were well tolerated in Japanese pediatric patients with AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.