ReviewMass spectrometry reviews
Electrokinetic Manipulations Combined With Direct and Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry.
Review in Mass spectrometry reviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Salt and Urine Matrices on Electrokinetic Stacking Coupled to Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026Article
- Electrophoresis-By-Accident in Electrospray Ion Source.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Analysis of Proteins and Peptides by Electrokinetic Stacking Coupled with Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Analysis of Drugs in Whole Blood by Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry with Integrated Solid-Phase Extraction.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful analytical technique that typically involves sample preparation and online analytical separation before MS detection. Traditional methods often face bottlenecks in sample preparation and analytical separation, despite the rapid detection capabilities of MS. This review explores the integration of electrokinetic manipulations directly with the ionization step to enhance MS performance, focusing on methods that eliminate or simplify sample preparation and separation processes. Techniques such as paper spray, electrophoresis in nanoelectrospray ionization (nESI) emitters, induced nESI, counterflow gradient electrofocusing, and in-syringe electrokinetics are highlighted for their ability to combine extraction and ionization in a single step, significantly improving throughput. The review delves into the use of electric fields during sample preparation and separations for these methods, demonstrating the efficiency of electrophoretic methods in driving extractions, crude separations, desalting, and enhanced sensitivity. The integration of these methods directly with MS ionization aims to enhance the analytical capabilities of mass spectrometry, while reducing costs and increasing throughput relative to traditional approaches.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.