Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39676300›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of developmental psychology2025

Adolescents' perceptions of using likes, comments, and other reactions-A qualitative investigation.

Gemma Rides, Helen Pote, Dawn Watling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of developmental psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gemma RidesDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-0322-7900
Helen PoteDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, UK.
Dawn WatlingDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, UK.

Funding

Royal Holloway, University of London
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the majority of young people using social media as a primary form of communication with friends and family, it is becoming increasingly important to understand how adolescents perceive their own and others' online behaviour. Participants (N = 34) aged 11-15 years took part in focus group discussions exploring their perceptions of the communication intentions of using online interpersonal feedback, specifically the use of 'reactions' (e.g., likes and comments). A thematic analysis of the transcripts indicated that young people are using social media reactions to (i) form and maintain impressions online, (ii) give, receive, and withhold support from others, and (iii) express themselves and tailor their social media experience. Findings show that adolescents are aware of the online social norms surrounding the use of reactions and how the number of reactions relates to their mood and feelings of self-worth.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorInterpersonal RelationsSocial MediaSocial PerceptionAdolescentChildFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSelf Conceptadolescentsimpression managementonline communicationonline supportself‐expressionsocial media

Identifiers

PMID39676300
PMCPMC12351196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.