ArticleCancer medicine2024
Statistical Fragility of Findings From Randomized Phase 3 Trials in Pediatric Oncology.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Survival-inferred fragility of statistical significance in phase III oncology trials.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe fragility index (FI) is an adjunctive metric to facilitate the interpretation of p-values in clinical trials. The FI has not been studied in phase 3 trials in pediatric oncology.
methodsPubMed was used to identify phase 3 pediatric oncology trials published between 1980 and 2020. We report trial characteristics and calculate the FI for trials with a binary outcome and survival-inferred fragility index (SIFI) for trials with a time-to-event outcome. FI/SIFI is the number of patients from one arm of a trial who would need to change groups for the statistical conclusion to change. We also report fragility quotients (FQ and SFQ) to normalize FI and SIFI relative to trial size.
resultsOne hundred and thirteen trials included sufficient data for analysis. The median FI for trials with a binary outcome (n = 40) was 4.5 (range: 1-33). The median SIFI for trials with a time-to-event outcome (n = 73) was 13 (range: 0-61). The FI or SIFI was less than the number of patients lost to follow-up in 25% of 36 trials. Median FQ and SFQ were 0.026 and 0.03, respectively, and did not significantly vary according to trial characteristics. While sample sizes increased over time, the FQ and SFQ remained stable.
conclusionsThe statistical conclusions of pediatric oncology phase 3 trials hinge on a relatively small number and proportion of patients. Despite the sample size limitations of low prevalence diseases, pediatric cancer trials are similarly or less fragile than adult oncology trials. Smaller trials do not appear more statistically fragile than larger trials. Statistical fragility appears to have remained constant over the four decades evaluated. We recommend reporting FI or SIFI, in conjunction with p-values, for all phase 3 pediatric oncology trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.