Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39676238›Full record

ArticleEcology2025

Contrasting demographic processes underlie uphill shifts in a desert ecosystem.

Sarah Skikne, Blair McLaughlin, Mark Fisher, David Ackerly, Erika Zavaleta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah SkikneDepartment of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, USA.
Blair McLaughlinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, USA.
Mark FisherBoyd Deep Canyon Desert Research Center, University of California Natural Reserve System, Indian Wells, California, USA.
David AckerlyDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1847-7398
Erika ZavaletaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change is projected to cause extensive plant range shifts, and, in many cases such shifts already are underway. Most long-term studies of range shifts measure emergent changes in species distributions but not the underlying demographic patterns that shape them. To better understand species' elevational range shifts and their underlying demographic processes, we use the powerful approach of rephotography, comparing historical (1978-1982) and modern (2015-2016) photographs taken along a 1000-m elevational gradient in the Colorado Desert of Southern California. This approach allowed us to track demographic outcomes for 4263 individual plants of 11 long-lived, perennial species over the past ~36 years. All species showed an upward shift in mean elevation (average = 45 m), consistent with observed increasing temperature and severe drought in the region. We found that varying demographic processes underlaid these elevational shifts, with some species showing higher recruitment and some showing higher survival with increasing elevation. Species with faster life-history rates (higher background recruitment and mortality rates) underwent larger elevational shifts. Our findings emphasize the importance of demography and life history in shaping range shift responses and future community composition, as well as the sensitivity of desert systems to climate change despite the typical "slow motion" population dynamics of perennial desert plants.

Indexed as

AltitudeClimate ChangeDesert ClimateEcosystemPlantsCaliforniaColoradoPopulation DynamicsBoyd Deep Canyonclimate changedemographydesert plantsrange shiftsrecruitmentrephotographysurvival

Identifiers

PMID39676238
PMCPMC11731419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.