Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39676165›Full record

ReviewAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2025

Leveraging artificial intelligence to reduce diagnostic errors in emergency medicine: Challenges, opportunities, and future directions.

R Andrew Taylor, Rohit B Sangal, Moira E Smith, Adrian D Haimovich, Adam Rodman, Mark S Iscoe, Suresh K Pavuluri, Christian Rose, Alexander T Janke, Donald S Wright and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07632859 (Diagnostic Accuracy of Two Large Language Models Against a Blinded Specialist Consensus Standard in Turkish Emergency Department Notes), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07632859 completednot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Accuracy of Two Large Language Models Against a Blinded Specialist Consensus Standard in Turkish Emergency Department Notes: A Retrospective Study of 600 Cases

TypeobservationalSponsorMarmara University Pendik Training and Research HospitalRan2026 to 2026Enrolled600ConditionsEmergency Medicine, Diagnostic Errors, Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Diagnosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Transforming Human-AI Collaboration in Emergency Care: The Role of AI in Adaptive Support Across Diagnostic Reasoning Modes.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

R Andrew TaylorDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9082-6644
Rohit B SangalDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0435-7029
Moira E SmithDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Adrian D HaimovichDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4106-7055
Adam RodmanDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mark S IscoeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4446-2488
Suresh K PavuluriDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Christian RoseDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5115-649X
Alexander T JankeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Donald S WrightDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2564-7754
Vimig SocratesDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7955-9875
Arwen DeclanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Prisma Health-Upstate, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8757-8950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic errors in health care pose significant risks to patient safety and are disturbingly common. In the emergency department (ED), the chaotic and high-pressure environment increases the likelihood of these errors, as emergency clinicians must make rapid decisions with limited information, often under cognitive overload. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising solutions to improve diagnostic errors in three key areas: information gathering, clinical decision support (CDS), and feedback through quality improvement. AI can streamline the information-gathering process by automating data retrieval, reducing cognitive load, and providing clinicians with essential patient details quickly. AI-driven CDS systems enhance diagnostic decision making by offering real-time insights, reducing cognitive biases, and prioritizing differential diagnoses. Furthermore, AI-powered feedback loops can facilitate continuous learning and refinement of diagnostic processes by providing targeted education and outcome feedback to clinicians. By integrating AI into these areas, the potential for reducing diagnostic errors and improving patient safety in the ED is substantial. However, successfully implementing AI in the ED is challenging and complex. Developing, validating, and implementing AI as a safe, human-centered ED tool requires thoughtful design and meticulous attention to ethical and practical considerations. Clinicians and patients must be integrated as key stakeholders across these processes. Ultimately, AI should be seen as a tool that assists clinicians by supporting better, faster decisions and thus enhances patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDiagnostic ErrorsEmergency MedicineEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPatient SafetyQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID39676165
PMCPMC11921089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.